Attachment 28: South Africa carries an Illegal Constitution
The Constitution of South Africa is built on deceit and lies, and is technically illegal.
The Constitution of South Africa has resulted in the people of South Africa losing their human rights which included becoming participants of enforced warfare, internally and internationally. The Constitution of South Africa has bound the nation to government regulations which impoverished the nation.
South African citizens cannot use the Constitution of South Africa to defend themselves because they are not a party to it.
The Constitution of South Africa is not suitable to South Africans.
The Constitution of South Africa was based on the principles drawn up by the British Crown. These principles are not suitable to the South African nation for the following reasons:
· The principles were designed to maintain control over South Africa as a colony of the Crown. This control was enforced through a central government with autocratic power which posed as a democracy by allowing a select community who are loyal to the Crown to control the governing of the country. There is too much power in the hands of a single political party.
· South Africans do not recognize the Crown as its government, nor its protectorate.
· The principles are not practical to a country as vast as South Africa which carries a huge array of different cultures, climates, ecological structures, and tribes. In comparing size, the entire Country known as England could fit into the single province called the Orange Free State in South Africa.
The principles created a restriction of trade, both nationally and internationally. The restriction on trade was created to maximize government control on all South African products to ensure maximum tax benefits whereby the state treasury would be enriched. The expenditure of the state treasury is controlled by the ruling government. This process impoverishes the citizens of Southern Africa and enriches the ruling political party of governance. Restriction of trade was also introduced into South Africa to curtail market relations between South Africa and other countries besides the Crown. Such restriction not only stifles the progress and development of South Africa, but also the international market. The Crown hereby has a colonizing effect upon the open world trade.
Although certain regulations in the constitution of South Africa has been amended by ruling political parties since its inauguration at the time the Union was established, it is still not suitable to the diverse nation it serves, continually disregarding the one race or the other. The statement made by the ruling president Mr. Zuma shows clearly how distorted the interpretation of the present system of Democracy, upon which the Constitution is based, has become, when he explained in Parliament to the opposition party that:
"You have more rights because you're a majority; you have less rights because you're a minority. That's how democracy works."
To consider that the State President is the very man who is meant to uphold the Constitution of a country, upon which the rights of the nation is enshrined, it is clear that the system of Democracy, as handed down to him by succession, is not the system he applies. A Democratic system provides shelter for the individual wherein he can expect equal rights, and the rights of the minorities are protected. We discuss the different systems of governance in Attachment 13 - Different systems of governance.
We call for the construction of a new Constitution for the States of South Africa, based on facts included in this document, and summarized in this Attachment in the following parts:
Section A: The Constitution of South Africa is built on deceit, lies and war crimes;
Section B: The Constitution is technically illegal; and
Section C: The effects of the Constitution of South Africa.
The Constitution of South Africa has resulted in the people of South Africa losing their human rights which included becoming participants of enforced warfare, internally and internationally. The Constitution of South Africa has bound the nation to government regulations which impoverished the nation.
South African citizens cannot use the Constitution of South Africa to defend themselves because they are not a party to it.
The Constitution of South Africa is not suitable to South Africans.
The Constitution of South Africa was based on the principles drawn up by the British Crown. These principles are not suitable to the South African nation for the following reasons:
· The principles were designed to maintain control over South Africa as a colony of the Crown. This control was enforced through a central government with autocratic power which posed as a democracy by allowing a select community who are loyal to the Crown to control the governing of the country. There is too much power in the hands of a single political party.
· South Africans do not recognize the Crown as its government, nor its protectorate.
· The principles are not practical to a country as vast as South Africa which carries a huge array of different cultures, climates, ecological structures, and tribes. In comparing size, the entire Country known as England could fit into the single province called the Orange Free State in South Africa.
The principles created a restriction of trade, both nationally and internationally. The restriction on trade was created to maximize government control on all South African products to ensure maximum tax benefits whereby the state treasury would be enriched. The expenditure of the state treasury is controlled by the ruling government. This process impoverishes the citizens of Southern Africa and enriches the ruling political party of governance. Restriction of trade was also introduced into South Africa to curtail market relations between South Africa and other countries besides the Crown. Such restriction not only stifles the progress and development of South Africa, but also the international market. The Crown hereby has a colonizing effect upon the open world trade.
Although certain regulations in the constitution of South Africa has been amended by ruling political parties since its inauguration at the time the Union was established, it is still not suitable to the diverse nation it serves, continually disregarding the one race or the other. The statement made by the ruling president Mr. Zuma shows clearly how distorted the interpretation of the present system of Democracy, upon which the Constitution is based, has become, when he explained in Parliament to the opposition party that:
"You have more rights because you're a majority; you have less rights because you're a minority. That's how democracy works."
To consider that the State President is the very man who is meant to uphold the Constitution of a country, upon which the rights of the nation is enshrined, it is clear that the system of Democracy, as handed down to him by succession, is not the system he applies. A Democratic system provides shelter for the individual wherein he can expect equal rights, and the rights of the minorities are protected. We discuss the different systems of governance in Attachment 13 - Different systems of governance.
We call for the construction of a new Constitution for the States of South Africa, based on facts included in this document, and summarized in this Attachment in the following parts:
Section A: The Constitution of South Africa is built on deceit, lies and war crimes;
Section B: The Constitution is technically illegal; and
Section C: The effects of the Constitution of South Africa.
Index to Attachment 28, extract from Bundle 8
Attachment 28 document, extract from Bundle 8
attachment_28_south_africa_carries_an_illegal_constitution.docx | |
File Size: | 101 kb |
File Type: | docx |